Research shelf / Physics / NLFGN-UFT
Written Updated
Non-local field-gravity, and an argument about superluminal recession
Two papers with very different confidence levels. One is a speculative unification programme grounded in a stated variational action, with its couplings admittedly unpinned. The other is a careful essay arguing that the "galaxies receding faster than light" dispute is a disagreement between rigorous GR positions, not evidence that anything is broken.
Theory or design only. No in-house measurement.
A variational non-local gravity programme keeping causal messaging at speeds ≤ c, plus an essay arguing superluminal recession is an interpretational split, not a failure of ΛCDM.
NLFGN-UFT proposes a non-local gravity theory that retains causal messaging at speeds ≤ c — explicitly distinguished from folklore "instantaneous non-locality". The field decomposes as φ = φ_f + φ_e + φ_int + Σ φ_subtle + ΣΣ φ_network, with advanced and retarded kernels whose exponential decay is parameterised by λ = ℏ/(m·v_field). Newton, Friedmann and growth equations are modified to carry network contributions, and the quantum state is composite: |Ψ⟩ = |ψ_base⟩ ⊗ |ψ_network⟩ ⊗ |ψ_subtle⟩.
The superluminal recession essay takes a different tack. Recession velocities above c — the CMB at roughly 3.2c today, about 58.1c at emission — are argued to reflect a genuine interpretational split between rigorous GR positions rather than a failure of ΛCDM. Sean Carroll’s dimensional critique and the coordinate-representation schools yield competing but mathematically valid readings.
The essay’s conclusion is deliberately modest: this is a pedagogical crisis in cosmology, not an empirical breakdown, and the interpretational disagreement does not change FLRW-derived observables.
Every number, and what stands behind it
A claim is only worth the evidence attached to it. Each row below carries its basis: measured on the author’s own hardware, derived from the construction, measured on synthetic data, projected from literature, or simply cited.
| Claim | Figure | Basis | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Causal non-locality | Messaging retained at speeds ≤ c | Derived | Distinguishes the programme from instantaneous non-locality |
| Field decomposition | φ = φ_f + φ_e + φ_int + Σφ_subtle + ΣΣφ_network | Derived | From the stated action |
| Kernel decay parameter | λ = ℏ/(m·v_field) | Derived | Exponentially decaying advanced + retarded kernels |
| CMB recession today | ~3.2c | Cited | Standard FLRW calculation |
| CMB recession at emission | ~58.1c | Cited | Standard FLRW calculation |
| Constraint sources | LIGO/Virgo bounds | Cited | Repository-native results are mostly literature cites |
| Original calculations | Incomplete | Projected | Stated by the author |
Measured — author-run experiment on the stated setup. Synthetic — measured, but on synthetic rather than real data. Derived — follows from the stated construction or proof. Projected — paper-stated projection, not an author-run benchmark. Cited — taken from external literature.
How it works
- Variational construction. The action is stated explicitly rather than assumed.
- Advanced and retarded kernels. With exponential decay structure.
- Modified field equations. Newton, Friedmann and growth equations carrying network contributions.
- Conceptual analysis (essay). Defends standard FLRW machinery while exposing the interpretational tension.
What it does not do
Taken from the folder’s own README. Nothing here has been softened.
- Couplings α₁, α₂ and γ are unpinned.
- Quantitative cosmology simulations are beyond present analytic scope.
- Network sector phase structure is unresolved.
- Environment-dependent GUP could conflict with atomic-scale precision measurements unless heavily suppressed.
- Neither document reports in-house measurements. Repository-native results are mostly literature citations.
Free under AGPL-3.0+ for almost everyone
Personal use, charities, education and organisations under AUD 50,000 a year pay nothing. A tiered commercial licence covers everyone else.