Research shelf / Materials & engineering / QDMP

Materials & engineering

A room-temperature quantum processor, and the seven reasons it doesn’t exist

CVD diamond synthesis is a mature industrial process. NV centres are real, work at room temperature, and are already used for sensing. The QDMP framework asks what would have to be true to get from there to a room-temperature quantum processor, and then spends most of its length on the seven reasons the answer is currently "a great deal".

Speculative AGPL-3.0+ / commercial
Evidence level

Theory or design only. No in-house measurement.

FolderQuantum Diamond Wafer
FieldMaterials & engineering
StatusSpeculative framework. Structured thought experiment with a barrier assessment.
What it is

Engineered NV-centre arrays in a metamaterial diamond lattice, proposed as a structured thought experiment — with seven named scientific barriers assessed against the current literature.

The proposal is engineered nitrogen-vacancy centre arrays embedded in a metamaterial diamond lattice, with electromagnetic fields during growth positioning the centres, microwave pathways for qubit control, and topological protection for the logical states. The claimed target regime is coherence beyond 100 seconds at room temperature, against milliseconds today, at a qubit density of 1014 per cubic centimetre.

The paper positions itself as a structured thought experiment rather than a device proposal. Its value is in the second half: seven fundamental scientific barriers are identified, each assessed against the current literature, with a targeted research programme proposed for each. Among them, the inability to position NV centres with nanometre precision and the fundamental decoherence mechanisms that currently cap coherence times.

A companion paper covers the industrial reality — CVD production throughput, isotopic purification, AI-assisted growth optimisation — and reads as a technology review and strategic assessment of what near-term diamond quantum applications actually look like, which is sensing rather than computing.

The barrier list is the deliverable. A paper proposing room-temperature quantum computing is worth roughly nothing on its own. A paper that proposes it and then enumerates seven specific blockers, assesses each against the literature, and identifies which are leverage points is a research-direction document — and the companion review’s conclusion that the near-term realistic application is sensing, not computing, is the honest bottom line.
Claims ledger

Every number, and what stands behind it

A claim is only worth the evidence attached to it. Each row below carries its basis: measured on the author’s own hardware, derived from the construction, measured on synthetic data, projected from literature, or simply cited.

Breakdown of this page’s claims by what stands behind each one
scroll to see the whole chart →
Every claim, weighted by its evidence. The table below is the same data row by row.
ClaimFigureBasisContext
Target coherence time100+ secondsProjectedAgainst milliseconds in current NV technology
Current NV coherencemillisecondsCitedRoom temperature, present-day devices
Target qubit density10¹⁴ per cm³ProjectedDesign target, not demonstrated
Logical qubits targeted1 millionProjectedFrom 1 billion physical, with topological protection
Scientific barriers identified7DerivedEach assessed against current literature
NV positioning precisionnot currently achievable at nm scaleCitedNamed as barrier — the honest half of the paper
Near-term realistic applicationquantum sensingCitedFrom the companion technology review

Measured — author-run experiment on the stated setup. Synthetic — measured, but on synthetic rather than real data. Derived — follows from the stated construction or proof. Projected — paper-stated projection, not an author-run benchmark. Cited — taken from external literature.

Methods

How it works

  • Metamaterial lattice engineering. Diamond structured so the lattice itself participates in protecting the quantum states.
  • In-situ defect engineering. Electromagnetic fields during CVD growth positioning NV centres, rather than implanting them afterwards.
  • Topological protection. Logical states protected by structure rather than by cryogenic isolation.
  • Barrier-first assessment. Seven blockers named and evaluated against literature, with a research programme proposed for each.
Stated limitations

What it does not do

Taken from the folder’s own README. Nothing here has been softened.

  • Explicitly speculative. The paper calls itself a thought experiment and does not claim a device is near.
  • The coherence target is five orders of magnitude beyond current room-temperature NV performance.
  • Nanometre-precision NV placement, the enabling capability for the whole architecture, does not exist.
  • Topological qubit protection in diamond is proposed by analogy to other platforms, not demonstrated.
  • No fabrication, no measurement, no device.
Use it

Free under AGPL-3.0+ for almost everyone

Personal use, charities, education and organisations under AUD 50,000 a year pay nothing. A tiered commercial licence covers everyone else.